[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14959371#comment-14959371
]
clebert suconic commented on ARTEMIS-27:
----------------------------------------
[~martyntaylor] Please keep the tables configurable. There are some users who
like to determine the name of their tables per broker (say if you have two
broker running on the same database).
> Database Implementation
> -----------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-27
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-27
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: clebert suconic
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> Notice that I'm not calling this JDBC. It's Database:
> The storage interface here should take in consideration NoSQL databases as
> possible options.
> My idea is that we should have a Callback interface optimizing locking times
> and using recator pattern through the OperationContext.
> Instead of using a single Executore could have multiple DB-Executors all
> capable of handling multiple client connections.
> If we deal this with being Database centric (not JDBC centric) features from
> the NoSQL could become available here for free
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
