[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15096285#comment-15096285
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on ARTEMIS-27:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 9dd9c021a0b8fdaf27ea6f2ce4e58520315f1095 in activemq-artemis's branch
refs/heads/master from [~martyntaylor]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;h=9dd9c02 ]
ARTEMIS-27 / ARTEMIS-339 Added JDBC Journal Support
> Database Implementation
> -----------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-27
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-27
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: clebert suconic
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> Notice that I'm not calling this JDBC. It's Database:
> The storage interface here should take in consideration NoSQL databases as
> possible options.
> My idea is that we should have a Callback interface optimizing locking times
> and using recator pattern through the OperationContext.
> Instead of using a single Executore could have multiple DB-Executors all
> capable of handling multiple client connections.
> If we deal this with being Database centric (not JDBC centric) features from
> the NoSQL could become available here for free
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
