[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15316471#comment-15316471
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on AMQ-6310:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit 6bf5987921f6fdb6844652bb77e2fc14b002ccf2 in activemq's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~jonathanmalek]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;h=6bf5987 ]

A fix for AMQ-6310

Checking for leading wildcard in the prefix for a virtualtopic,
modifying the behavior of shouldDispatch in the VirtualTopicInterceptor.


> Certain VirtualTopic configurations no longer send messages to the correct 
> queue
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-6310
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6310
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.13.0
>            Reporter: Jonathan Malek
>            Assignee: Christopher L. Shannon
>
> Several of our brokers have a VirtualTopic with the name {{VirtualTopic.>}} 
> and a prefix of {{\*.\*.}}.  The expected behavior would be that a message 
> sent to {{VirtualTopic.A}} should be consumed on a queue with any pattern 
> that matches {{\*.\*.VirtualTopic.A}}.
> For example, if a message is published to a topic called {{VirtualTopic.A}}, 
> that would be consumed on queues {{Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.A}} and 
> {{Subscriber.A.VirtualTopic.A}}.
> However, since the change made in AMQ-6058, it appears that, given the 
> example above, _neither_ queue receives the message.  This is because the 
> change performs a startsWith comparison of the destination against the 
> prefix, rather than a regex comparison.
> If there is a reason to prevent leading wildcards in the prefix, it should be 
> documented, otherwise the sanity check in shouldDispatch(...) needs to be 
> updated to handle it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to