[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15976851#comment-15976851
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1093:
-----------------------------------------

Github user gaohoward commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215#discussion_r112476953
  
    --- Diff: 
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpSendReceiveTest.java
 ---
    @@ -53,38 +56,61 @@
     import org.apache.qpid.proton.engine.Sender;
     import org.jgroups.util.UUID;
     import org.junit.Test;
    +import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
    +import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
     import org.slf4j.Logger;
     import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
     
     /**
      * Test basic send and receive scenarios using only AMQP sender and 
receiver links.
      */
    +@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
    --- End diff --
    
    @tabish121 ok, I'll remove it to keep it simple. 


> Full qualified queue name support
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Howard Gao
>            Assignee: Howard Gao
>             Fix For: 2.next
>
>
> Broker should support full qualified queue names (FQQN) as well as bare queue 
> names. This means when clients access to a queue they have two equivalent 
> ways to do so. One way is by queue names and the other is by FQQN (i.e. 
> address::qname) names. When accessing a queue by its bare name, it is 
> required that the name should be unique across all addresses.
> Otherwise a warning is given and client should use FQQN instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to