[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15980514#comment-15980514
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1093:
-----------------------------------------

Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1215#discussion_r112842725
  
    --- Diff: 
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/util/FQQN.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.util;
    +
    +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.SimpleString;
    +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.CompositeAddress;
    +
    +public final class FQQN {
    +
    --- End diff --
    
    Can you remove this class, and move these two methods towards 
CompositeAddress


> Full qualified queue name support
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1093
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Howard Gao
>            Assignee: Howard Gao
>             Fix For: 2.next
>
>
> Broker should support full qualified queue names (FQQN) as well as bare queue 
> names. This means when clients access to a queue they have two equivalent 
> ways to do so. One way is by queue names and the other is by FQQN (i.e. 
> address::qname) names. When accessing a queue by its bare name, it is 
> required that the name should be unique across all addresses.
> Otherwise a warning is given and client should use FQQN instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to