[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16342176#comment-16342176
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-550:
----------------------------------------
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1820
If it helps so here is the conceptual logical model of VT:

And here is the conceptual model of how JMS 2.0 SharedDurableSubscriber
maps into Core Address model.

If you note essentially the VT is the Address (its multicast), and then the
queues are.....queues.
I don't see much difference now.
> Add support for virtual topic consumers
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-550
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Benjamin Graf
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-01-26-09-02-08-192.png
>
>
> Artemis should support virtual topic consumers as alternative to topic
> subscriptions as ActiveMQ itself does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)