[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16342176#comment-16342176
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-550:
----------------------------------------

Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1820
  
    If it helps so here is the conceptual logical model of VT:
    
    
![vt](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1387822/35473197-3304146c-0374-11e8-9e33-3506a3633e04.png)
    
    And here is the conceptual model of how JMS 2.0 SharedDurableSubscriber 
maps into Core Address model.
    
    
![shared](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1387822/35473219-694e916e-0374-11e8-90d8-5310d900e73a.png)
    
    If you note essentially the VT is the Address (its multicast), and then the 
queues are.....queues.
    
    I don't see much difference now.



> Add support for virtual topic consumers
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-550
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-550
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Benjamin Graf
>            Assignee: Martyn Taylor
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2018-01-26-09-02-08-192.png
>
>
> Artemis should support virtual topic consumers as alternative to topic 
> subscriptions as ActiveMQ itself does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to