[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16667798#comment-16667798
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1710:
-----------------------------------------
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401#discussion_r229111410
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/paging/impl/PagingManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -437,12 +449,27 @@ public void processReload() throws Exception {
}
}
+ private boolean ignoreGlobalMaxSize(SimpleString address) {
+ if (this.addressPrefixesIgnoringGlobalMaxSize == null) {
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ //for a small number of prefixes to check we can use just a
linear search too :)
+ for (SimpleString prefixes :
this.addressPrefixesIgnoringGlobalMaxSize) {
--- End diff --
I have implemented this feature lefting it opened to be extended to allow
other address prefixes to be added too, but I can implementing it too just
considering this specific use case too: just magement addresses messages.
> Allow for management messages to pass the global-max-size limit
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1710
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1710
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ulf Lilleengen
> Assignee: Francesco Nigro
> Priority: Major
>
> Use case: global-max-size is set to some limit to prevent the broker from
> falling over. The broker is configured with N queues which are all blocked by
> this limit.
> If this limit is reached, however, it is not possible to perform management
> operations on the broker, so you're stuck.
>
> It should be possible to have an address like 'activemq.management' bypass
> this limit so that a broker can be recovered when the global-max-size is
> reached.
>
> To work around the problem, an external component needs to ensure that all
> addresses created have a max-size-bytes set so that worst case, there is some
> room left for 'activemq.management' address. In this case the broker
> configuration needs to be known by the component creating addresses which is
> impractical and it feels like this problem would be easier to solve inside
> the broker.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
