[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2385?focusedWorklogId=262355&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-262355
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-2385:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 18/Jun/19 14:55
            Start Date: 18/Jun/19 14:55
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: brusdev commented on pull request #2714: ARTEMIS-2385 
Log header for rejecting message with too large header
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2714
 
 
   Use warning level to add in the log the ID and debug level to add in the
   log the message header of rejecting message with too large header.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 262355)
            Time Spent: 10m
    Remaining Estimate: 0h

> Log header for rejecting message with too large header
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-2385
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2385
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Domenico Bruscino
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The usage scenario I am thinking about; broker admins see many of these 
> rejections but no way to trace it back to the application that is sending the 
> offending message(s) to the broker. I have seen this scenario a few times, 
> where broker admins had issues identifying which applications were 
> responsible for these messages; so any data to help identify the offending 
> message would be very useful.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to