[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17281848#comment-17281848
 ] 

Luís Alves commented on ARTEMIS-3102:
-------------------------------------

I agree. It's a bad solution to parse exception messages. Maybe just dropping 
the connection on any javax.jms.JMSSecurityException, as if he doesn't have 
authorization, something is not well configured. Going to try to figure how to 
get pooled-jms to drop the connection on a javax.jms.JMSSecurityException.

Yet, I think sending the proper message code would be an improvement for the 
current ActiveMQSecurityManager5 implementation, but with low priority. 

> ActiveMQSecurityManager5 should disconnect user when his authentication is 
> not valid anymore
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-3102
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3102
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.16.0
>            Reporter: Luís Alves
>            Priority: Major
>
> On the following code block:
> {code:java}
> final Boolean validated;
>          if (securityManager instanceof ActiveMQSecurityManager5) {
>             Subject subject = getSubjectForAuthorization(session, 
> ((ActiveMQSecurityManager5) securityManager));
>             validated = ((ActiveMQSecurityManager5) 
> securityManager).authorize(subject, roles, checkType, fqqn != null ? 
> fqqn.toString() : bareAddress.toString());
>          }
> {code}
> when the retrieved Subject is null (means the user cannot authenticate 
> anymore) the connection should be terminated. If not this will cause that the 
> user is not authorized to do the operation, but in fact he shouldn't not even 
> be allowed to connect. 
> Quoting [~gtully] on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2886 where 
> he explains very well the problem:
> {quote}I don't think your use case is unique to OpenID, the cached ldap jaas 
> login module can find that permissions have been removed from ldap at runtime 
> and that authorization has been removed. Once the cache expires and jaas is 
> again asked, it too will return a null subject i think and subsequent 
> operations will result in exceptions in the same way. I don't know how it 
> will behave if a user is no longer valid.
> typically a security exception on initial connection, a failure to 
> authenticate, will cause the connection to be rejected, the connection to 
> close. But security exceptions are expected at runtime if you have access to 
> some resources and not others and are not aware of that. If permissions 
> change at runtime, some variation here is ok.
> If however, a users is no longer able to authenticate (in your case, the 
> token has expired and cannot be renewed, then we need to drop the connection.
> as a straw man design:
> We may have to change the use of Subject in the code, a valid subject is non 
> null and has a valid artemis user principal. We need to check for the 
> presence of the user principal. That can indicate if the authentication is 
> still valid. If we can proceed with authorization checks.
> At runtime, we may find that the non null subject becomes invalid b/c the 
> artemis principal is removed and that should cause any authorisation attempt 
> to fail and the connection to error out or be forcefully closed.
> I think we need to do something like this.{quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to