[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17436869#comment-17436869
]
Gary Tully commented on ARTEMIS-1925:
-------------------------------------
I think a new Jira for auto creation, redistribution scenarios is best.
I agree it is strange, the mix of loadbalance type and redistribution. I could
not really simplify due to backward compatibility concerns, (I think they are
best separated). But in terms of routing semantic, that happens first,
redistribution happens on bindings/queues when there are no local consumers. It
is independent of the type of address that binding/queue is bound too.
redistribution does not happen at the address level.
there is an analogy with the federation feature/support. Address federation,
which will reroute on the target, and Queue federation while will move messages
between bindings/queues are two different things. (it is a bit like that with
redistribution, afaik.)
thanks again for all your testing/feedback etc
> Allow message redistribution even with OFF message-load-balancing semantics
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-1925
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1925
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Justin Bertram
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.20.0
>
> Time Spent: 10.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently if the {{message-load-balancing}} is {{STRICT}} or {{OFF}} then
> message redistribution is disabled. Message redistribution should be
> controlled only by the {{redistribtion-delay}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
