[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4680?focusedWorklogId=915269&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-915269
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4680:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 18/Apr/24 09:31
            Start Date: 18/Apr/24 09:31
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: gemmellr commented on code in PR #3:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console-plugin/pull/3#discussion_r1570361047


##########
artemis-console-distribution/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

Review Comment:
   > I do think we should rename the repo to 
activemq-[artemis-console](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console),
 how do we get that done?
   > 
   
   First, discuss and agree it on the list....then if agreed, we could either 
create the new repo and then ask infra to delete this old one, or else ask if 
infra will rename this one. They might want a vote as assurance before the 
rename or delete.
   
   > I did think about changing the 
[artemis-console-plugin](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console-plugin)
 to [artemis-console](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console) 
but I thought that would clash with the 
[artemis-console](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console) module 
currently in activemq-artemis at some point, wdyt?
   
   Yeah we definitely need to avoid clashing with existing artemis module GAVs 
for anything published, which is most easily done by avoiding the same module 
name (we could play with increased versions, but...still messy when both are 
still around).
   
   From what I see, it looks like the `artemis-console-plugin` module is just a 
pom that doesnt actually deploy anything except itself, and rather just builds 
stuff locally into a dir currently that other stuff then uses. So its name 
actually seems largely inconsequential, seems like noone is really likely to 
reference the deployed module itself currently (but rather, reference the war 
instead)? Or am I missing something?
   





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 915269)
    Time Spent: 3.5h  (was: 3h 20m)

> Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4680
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4680
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Web Console
>            Reporter: Andy Taylor
>            Assignee: Andy Taylor
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 3.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The current console is based upon HawtIO 1 which in turn is built on 
> Bootstrap. Bootstrap is old and no longer actively being maintained.
>  
> This improvement is to migrate the current console to use HawtIO 4 which i 
> based on Typescript, react and Patternfly.
>  
> A WIP can be found 
> [here|https://github.com/andytaylor/activemq-artemis/tree/artemis-console-ng]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to