[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4680?focusedWorklogId=915270&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-915270
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4680:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 18/Apr/24 09:34
Start Date: 18/Apr/24 09:34
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: andytaylor commented on code in PR #3:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console-plugin/pull/3#discussion_r1570367927
##########
artemis-console-distribution/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
Review Comment:
> > I do think we should rename the repo to
activemq-[artemis-console](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console),
how do we get that done?
>
> First, discuss and agree it on the list....then if agreed, we could either
create the new repo and then ask infra to delete this old one, or else ask if
infra will rename this one. They might want a vote as assurance before the
rename or delete.
>
Ok, I will send out an email to discuss
> > I did think about changing the
[artemis-console-plugin](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console-plugin)
to [artemis-console](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console)
but I thought that would clash with the
[artemis-console](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-console) module
currently in activemq-artemis at some point, wdyt?
>
> Yeah we definitely need to avoid clashing with existing artemis module
GAVs for anything published, which is most easily done by avoiding the same
module name (we could play with increased versions, but...still messy when both
are still around).
>
> From what I see, it looks like the `artemis-console-plugin` module is just
a pom that doesnt actually deploy anything except itself, and rather just
builds stuff locally into a dir currently that other stuff then uses. So its
name actually seems largely inconsequential, seems like noone is really likely
to reference the deployed module itself currently (but rather, reference the
war instead)? Or am I missing something?
no you are correct
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 915270)
Time Spent: 3h 40m (was: 3.5h)
> Upgrade the console to use HawtIO 4
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-4680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4680
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Web Console
> Reporter: Andy Taylor
> Assignee: Andy Taylor
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 3h 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The current console is based upon HawtIO 1 which in turn is built on
> Bootstrap. Bootstrap is old and no longer actively being maintained.
>
> This improvement is to migrate the current console to use HawtIO 4 which i
> based on Typescript, react and Patternfly.
>
> A WIP can be found
> [here|https://github.com/andytaylor/activemq-artemis/tree/artemis-console-ng]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
