[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8463?focusedWorklogId=944426&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-944426
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AMQ-8463:
---------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 19/Nov/24 17:04
            Start Date: 19/Nov/24 17:04
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: mattrpav commented on code in PR #1329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1329#discussion_r1848736947


##########
activemq-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/management/LongStatistic.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.activemq.management;
+
+/**
+ * A statistic to store a single long value that is not incremented
+ * 
+ * Example: Store a timestamp value of a recent message
+ * 
+ */
+public interface LongStatistic extends UnsampledStatistic {

Review Comment:
   Yeah, I think this could be changed, but I'm wondering if it gets verbose to 
the consumer of the metric. I felt my original approach was "following the 
as-is" vs getting to the optimal target state.
   
   If we go generic, do we add a generic parameter for all the dimensions? 
Sampled, Summed, Ranged, Fixed value, etc?
   
   I think the interfaces do a good job of communicating the type. Feels like 
adding generics just pushes the type info to the consuming service code.
   
   ```
      public UnsampledStatisticImpl<Long> getDequeuedMessageBrokerOutTime() {
           return dequeuedMessageBrokerOutTime;
       }
   ```
   
   I'm not married to either approach.





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 944426)
    Time Spent: 1h 20m  (was: 1h 10m)

> Add advancedMessageStatistics to destinations
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-8463
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8463
>             Project: ActiveMQ Classic
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>            Reporter: Matt Pavlovich
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 6.2.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Observability and tracking metrics on the destination can provide current 
> message age and indication of message flow activity.
> // Most recent enqueued message info
> enqueuedMessageID 
> enqueuedMessageTimestamp
> enqueuedMessageBrokerInTime
> // Most recent dequeued message info
> dequeuedMessageID
> dequeuedMessageTimestamp
> dequeuedMessageBrokerInTime
> // First enqueue since boot
> firstEnqueuedMessageID
> firstEnqueuedMessageTimestamp 
> firstEnqueuedMessageBrokerInTime
> // First dequeue since boot
> firstDequeuedMessageID
> firstDequeuedMessageTimestamp
> firstDequeuedMessageBrokerInTime



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to