[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17902344#comment-17902344
 ] 

Liviu Citu commented on ARTEMIS-5189:
-------------------------------------

Hi Justin,

As I said in Classic we have recently discovered a big performance cost caused 
by durable consumers. I am not sure about Artemis as that client didn't yet 
migrated to Artemis.

However, in case the problem will persist also on Artemis, is there any other 
kind of Failover/HA solution that you recommend in this particular case (with 
non-durable subscriptions)? I suppose there isn't since the messages for these 
subscriptions are stored in the memory of each broker.

Thanks,

> Lost messages in non-durable queues during failover
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-5189
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5189
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.38.0
>            Reporter: Liviu Citu
>            Assignee: Justin Bertram
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: broker_backup.xml, broker_primary.xml
>
>
> I am currently migrating from Classic Broker to Artemis Broker and I also 
> want to enable the Failover (Shared-Stored) switch. I have configured Artemis 
> with Failover (Shared-Store) and during the failover switch, topic consumers 
> loose events before reconnecting. When using durable consumers this is not 
> happening so the problem (as expected) is only replicable for non-durable 
> consumers.
> The reason for which I want to avoid using durable consumer is the 
> performance impact on the broker side when there is a big number of messages 
> and consumers for them. For a live client using Classic BrokerĀ  I have 
> observed a big impact and slowness of the broker under high load (thousands 
> of messages with more than 300 durable consumers). Indeed I am not able to 
> test the same with Artemis broker as I do not have access to that environment 
> however my expectation is that the Artemis broker will behave similarly.
> Is there a parameter in Artemis broker to make it wait a bit after the switch 
> before dropping topic message, so that previous active consumersĀ  to have 
> time to reconnect and consume the messages?
> Attached the Artemis Brokers Primary/Backup configuration.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to