[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16258236#comment-16258236
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARROW-1816:
---------------------------------------
icexelloss commented on issue #1330: wip: ARROW-1816: [Java] Resolve new vector
classes structure for timestamp, date and maybe interval
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1330#issuecomment-345474775
This PR is a RFC.
I think the resulting timestamp vector (NullableTimestampVector) is still
branch-free on the cell level. cc @jacques-n can you take a look and let me
know what you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> [Java] Resolve new vector classes structure for timestamp, date and maybe
> interval
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-1816
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1816
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Li Jin
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> Personally I think having 8 vector classes for timestamps is not great. This
> is discussed at some point during the PR:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1203#discussion_r145241388
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
