[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16756791#comment-16756791
]
Robert Nishihara commented on ARROW-4418:
-----------------------------------------
[~zhijunfu], I'd suggest doing a straightforward translation from the AE event
loop to boost::asio. The multithreaded architecture sounds pretty complex, but
I think it makes sense to explore if it provides substantial performance
benefits (though it may not make sense for modest performance benefits).
Maybe we should use {{asio}} instead of {{boost::asio}} because {{asio}} looks
like it's header only. http://think-async.com/Asio/AsioAndBoostAsio
[~pitrou], the non-boost {{asio}} looks like it's header only, so that may be
preferable. What do you think about the overall tradeoff?
> [Plasma] replace event loop with boost::asio for plasma store
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-4418
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4418
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plasma (C++)
> Reporter: Zhijun Fu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Original text:
> It would be nice to move plasma store from current event loop to boost::asio
> to modernize the code, and more importantly to benefit from the
> functionalities provided by asio, which I think also provides opportunities
> for performance improvement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
