[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16760135#comment-16760135
 ] 

Antoine Pitrou commented on ARROW-4418:
---------------------------------------

>  the non-boost asio looks like it's header only, so that may be preferable. 
> What do you think about the overall tradeoff

That sounds nice indeed. If the standalone asio is maintained and if the APIs 
are compatible, then I think we can try that.

> [Plasma] replace event loop with boost::asio for plasma store
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-4418
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4418
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: C++ - Plasma
>            Reporter: Zhijun Fu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Original text:
> It would be nice to move plasma store from current event loop to boost::asio 
> to modernize the code, and more importantly to benefit from the 
> functionalities provided by asio, which I think also provides opportunities 
> for performance improvement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to