[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16778832#comment-16778832
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-4651:
-------------------------------------
Changing the protocol to use a well-defined URI specification for locations
seems OK to me.
> [Format] Flight Location should be more flexible than a (host, port) pair
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-4651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4651
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: FlightRPC, Format
> Affects Versions: 0.12.0
> Reporter: Antoine Pitrou
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.14.0
>
>
> The more future-proof solution is probably to define a URI format. gRPC
> already has something like that, though we might want to define our own
> format:
> https://grpc.io/grpc/cpp/md_doc_naming.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
