[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16789902#comment-16789902
]
David Li commented on ARROW-4651:
---------------------------------
Sorry, I totally missed this earlier [~pitrou]. I'd also be in favor of
defining a URI in place of the Location struct. It'd be good to then get TLS
and domain socket support on top.
> [Format] Flight Location should be more flexible than a (host, port) pair
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-4651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-4651
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: FlightRPC, Format
> Affects Versions: 0.12.0
> Reporter: Antoine Pitrou
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.14.0
>
>
> The more future-proof solution is probably to define a URI format. gRPC
> already has something like that, though we might want to define our own
> format:
> https://grpc.io/grpc/cpp/md_doc_naming.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
