Fokko commented on PR #2554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/2554#issuecomment-1772736483

   @zcsizmadia Thanks for jumping in here. I've drafted a document: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10syT_J5ZoJ23wvzfYCaPTY7U89OmgS6ZmU7GeGWria8/edit
 Feel free to comment on the document or reply on the 
[devlist](https://lists.apache.org/thread/vr6ckgt4sqdklywjp7rfprxqvl54f4lr).
   
   > Without having deeper discussions, my gut feeling is that a nano time type 
should be only a a 64/128(?) bit long integer since the real world is a wild 
west when it comes to that precision. Ergo might not require a new type. Of 
course I am open to any discussions about this.
   
   I fully agree here. The [INT96 didn't really 
land](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-323).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to