[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5299?focusedWorklogId=165110&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-165110
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-5299:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 12/Nov/18 20:13
            Start Date: 12/Nov/18 20:13
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: HuangLED commented on issue #7012: Revert "Revert 
"Revert "[BEAM-5299] Define max timestamp for global w…
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7012#issuecomment-438013532
 
 
   R: @chamikaramj @mxm 
   cc: @lukecwik @boyuanzz 
   
   Chamikaramj also mentioned there could be a way to make this change with 
less effects on postcommit integration tests (correct me if I misunderstood). 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 165110)
    Time Spent: 12.5h  (was: 12h 20m)

> Define max global window as a shared value in protos like URN enums.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-5299
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5299
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: beam-model, sdk-go, sdk-java-core, sdk-py-core
>            Reporter: Luke Cwik
>            Assignee: Maximilian Michels
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: portability
>             Fix For: 2.9.0
>
>          Time Spent: 12.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Instead of having each language define a max timestamp themselves, define the 
> max timestamps within proto to be shared across different languages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to