[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-13939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17498701#comment-17498701
 ] 

Robert Burke commented on BEAM-13939:
-------------------------------------

Just FYI, I think force pushing resets the bit that lets first time 
contributors run the tests. So each time you do, I'll need to take a quick look 
and re-approve.

> Go SDK: Protobuf namespace conflict
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-13939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-13939
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: beam-model, sdk-go
>    Affects Versions: 2.36.0
>            Reporter: Milan Patel
>            Priority: P2
>              Labels: easyfix
>         Attachments: demobug.zip
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The Go SDK generated grpc protobufs are not namespaced with enough 
> granularity. If a user has another external dependency with the same protobuf 
> file registered with the proto runtime, their compiled binary will panic at 
> runtime pointing the user to this [doc 
> page|https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/go/faq#fix-namespace-conflict].
>  
> In the interim, following the instructions to add either ldflags to the 
> compiler or an environment var to the binary works, but this is an unideal 
> solution since only one of the duplicate proto specifications will be 
> accessible from a [global 
> registry|https://pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/[email protected]/reflect/protoregistry].
>  
> Ask: Regenerate the go protos such that descriptors like 
> [these|https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/84353a7c973d3acaaa56d81c265dce7193a56be5/sdks/go/pkg/beam/model/pipeline_v1/metrics.pb.go#L797-L811]
>  are outputted with filenames that are more granular, such as a filename that 
> includes the directory structure of the repository.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to