[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14347?focusedWorklogId=769931&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-769931
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-14347:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 12/May/22 22:18
            Start Date: 12/May/22 22:18
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: damccorm commented on PR #17650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/17650#issuecomment-1125470664

   > We do need it for the same reason. Please add a benchmark for wrapping and 
invoking a simple function caller, and you'll see.
   
   Oh yeah, my point isn't that it isn't much better in terms of performance, 
just that its not a huge usability win vs the user manually calling these 
themselves. The performance bump is evident from the existing benchmarks on 
`register.DoFnXxY` which are doing the same thing, I'm pretty happy to add the 
extra benchmark though, and will have it shortly.
   
   I should've been more clear in my original comment that I **do** still think 
this is a good idea, I just think it is less useful because its not too hard 
for users to do the right thing themselves already.




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 769931)
    Time Spent: 21h  (was: 20h 50m)

> [Go SDK] Allow users to optimize DoFns with a single generic registration 
> function
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-14347
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14347
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: sdk-go
>            Reporter: Danny McCormick
>            Assignee: Danny McCormick
>            Priority: P2
>          Time Spent: 21h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Right now, to optimize DoFn execution, users have to use the code generator. 
> This updates to allow them to use generics instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to