ivankelly commented on issue #1218: Support LacPiggyback, LongPoll and 
ExplicitLac in db ledger storage
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1218#issuecomment-369248128
 
 
   @sijie @eolivelli It looks like the explicit LAC info is 100% transient in 
this case. I would suggest leaving out explicit LAC until we have persistence 
for it in DB storage.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to