[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15188160#comment-15188160
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1144:
--------------------------------------
My mistake. I now see the only difference between calcite/LICENSE and
calcite/avatica/LICENSE is that the former has a protobuf section. Actually I
think Avatica should have a protobuf section, and (now Avatica is a separate
release) Calcite should not.
> Fix Avatica LICENSE file
> ------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1144
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Needs to say "Apache Calcite Avatica Sub Components" not "Apache Calcite Sub
> Components".
> Also, placeholder for concern about missing jekyll/sass entries from Julian.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
