[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15869137#comment-15869137
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1637:
--------------------------------------

Maybe. Or should we go even further and make a new package 
org.apache.calcite.rel.mutable? (And therefore the MutableXxx classes would be 
public.) The question is: how much functionality in the mutable rels is 
specific to materialized view matching? If little or none, a package makes 
sense.

> Add missing MutableRels for all relational expressions
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1637
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1637
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Maryann Xue
>            Assignee: Maryann Xue
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> Missing MutableRels include:
> MutableCalc,
> MutableCollect,
> MutableCorrelate,
> MutableExchange,
> MutableIntersect,
> MutableMinus,
> MutableSample,
> MutableSemiJoin,
> MutableTableFunctionScan,
> MutableTableModify,
> MutableUncollect,
> MutableWindow



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to