[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16616855#comment-16616855
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-2412:
--------------------------------------
bq. You never now who is a committer and who is not.
Just check https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html
bq. On the other hand, there are multiple commits that have (Julian Hyde) in
the commit message
No, there are not, unless you are trying to split hairs.
Hopefully policy is clear now.
> Avatica/Calcite tests against Windows via Appveyor
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2412
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2412
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Reporter: Sergey Nuyanzin
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
>
> Unfortunately Travis does not support Windows
> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2104. There is a suggestion to
> use Appveyor.
> There are PRs attached both for Avatica and Calcite (i tried to make similar
> to travis.yml)
> The only different Java option for Calcite is {code}-Djna.nosys=true{code}
> which is required to overcome
> https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/issues/384 while Appveyor build.
> Also unfortunately there is no option to have parallel build even between
> projects (at least for free accounts) => to speed up the process I use only
> java8
> + in case of Calcite do not use cache as Appveyor fails to save because of
> the size - I guess it is also free account limitation
> P.S. it should be noted that to have successful build on Appveyor
> CALCITE-2409 should be fixed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
