[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16686203#comment-16686203
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CALCITE-2412:
-----------------------------------------

Github user snuyanzin commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/65
  
    I think it is possible as the PR contains only a new file which is not 
present in master => no conflicts should be observed.
    Anyway I did rebase against master and also enabled jdk9/jdk10 for appveyor 
build (unfortunately it still does not support jdk11, jdk12).
    
    If it is possible besides the merging of the PR it would be great to have 
turned on Avatica appveoyr built on commit with its own badge. I think I do not 
have rights to do it but I did it for my own fork.
    
    By the way here it is the link to the last appveyor build related to this 
issue
    https://ci.appveyor.com/project/snuyanzin/calcite-avatica 
    



> Avatica/Calcite tests against Windows via Appveyor
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2412
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2412
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Sergey Nuyanzin
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>
> Unfortunately Travis does not support Windows 
> https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci/issues/2104. There is a suggestion to 
> use Appveyor.
> There are PRs attached both for Avatica and Calcite (i tried to make similar 
> to travis.yml)
> The only different Java option for Calcite is {code}-Djna.nosys=true{code} 
> which is required to overcome 
> https://github.com/java-native-access/jna/issues/384 while Appveyor build.
> Also unfortunately there is no option to have parallel build even between 
> projects (at least for free accounts) => to speed up the process I use only 
> java8
> + in case of Calcite do not use cache as Appveyor fails to save because of  
> the size - I guess it is also free account limitation
> P.S. it should be noted that to have successful build on Appveyor 
> CALCITE-2409 should be fixed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to