[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807826#comment-16807826
 ] 

Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-2973:
----------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this [~hhlai1990] ! It seems that it is not only a rule 
issue but you also plan to change the merge join algorithm implementation. I 
think the summary is a bit misleading. How about changing it to "Allow theta 
joins to be executed using a merge join algorithm" or something similar?

Apart from that, I think it would be better to generalize EnumerableMergeJoin 
operator than create a new one.

> Make EnumerableMergeJoinRule to support a theta join
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2973
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2973
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.19.0
>            Reporter: Lai Zhou
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Now the EnumerableMergeJoinRule only supports an inner and equi join.
> If users make a theta-join query  for a large dataset (such as 10000*10000), 
> the nested-loop join process will take dozens of time than the sort-merge 
> join process .
> So if we can apply merge-join or hash-join rule for a theta join, it will 
> improve the performance greatly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to