[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16808174#comment-16808174
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-2973:
--------------------------------------

I agree with [~zabetak]. EnumerableMergeJoinRule should handle the cases that 
can be implemented by EnumerableMergeJoin - no more, no less. If you enhance 
EnumerableMergeJoin (say, adding a Rex condition to be evaluated whenever there 
is a pair of rows that have matched) then you can enhance the rule to generate 
code for it.

> Make EnumerableMergeJoinRule to support a theta join
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2973
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2973
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.19.0
>            Reporter: Lai Zhou
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Now the EnumerableMergeJoinRule only supports an inner and equi join.
> If users make a theta-join query  for a large dataset (such as 10000*10000), 
> the nested-loop join process will take dozens of time than the sort-merge 
> join process .
> So if we can apply merge-join or hash-join rule for a theta join, it will 
> improve the performance greatly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to