[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17007796#comment-17007796
]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3285:
----------------------------------------
[~vladimirsitnikov] I checked your fix at
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1702/commits/686d985d4a45b1306d4d397ad51e6cc03fe3ba4d,
in which you extract non-equi condition on top of MergeJoin, that may still
generate wrong result for outer joins:
select * from foo left join bar on foo.a=bar.a and foo.b > bar.c;
> EnumerableMergeJoin should support non-equi join conditions
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3285
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
> Assignee: Jin Xing
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.22.0
>
> Time Spent: 2h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Calcite should be able to generate EnumerableMergeJoin with non-equi join
> conditions, as long as there are equi-join conditions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
