[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17060036#comment-17060036
]
Ruben Q L commented on CALCITE-3285:
------------------------------------
Recap:
[PR#1788|https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1788] proposes a solution for
the current ticket which:
- a) does not break backwards compatibility
- b) it is in any case flagged as "Experimental"
At this stage, if no-one objects within three days, I'll assume lazy consensus,
commit it and move this ticket as "Resolved".
> EnumerableMergeJoin should support non-equi join conditions
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3285
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
> Assignee: Vladimir Sitnikov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 3h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Calcite should be able to generate EnumerableMergeJoin with non-equi join
> conditions, as long as there are equi-join conditions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
