[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17399447#comment-17399447
]
Josh Elser commented on CALCITE-4727:
-------------------------------------
bq. I thought that was maybe that was the culprit from the JSON serialization
path.
That's my only guess -- Jackson is trying to put something extra into the JSON
type that wasn't expected by the original author (your's truly). I'll have to
spin up a JSON-based example. It's been a while.
> Possible incorrect RpcMetadata JSON reference
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-4727
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4727
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: John Bodley
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Per [CALCITE-4367|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4367] the
> RpMetadata JSON reference is missing the required `response` field. As
> discussed in the issue and per
> [here|https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/blob/89e0deb510311b85b8c8bacde6d2ff70c309930e/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/avatica/remote/Service.java#L2668-L2678],
> though this isn't an actual response is does seem to expect a response type
> signature.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
