[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17608974#comment-17608974
]
Bertil Chapuis edited comment on CALCITE-5280 at 9/24/22 10:58 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I now better understand how the SqlValidator internals and I believe that (for
now ;) naming scalar and aggregate functions differently is the right approach.
When determining if a function is an aggregate, the validator simply checks if
one of the matching functions is an aggregate. The type of operands, the
number of operands and the precedence of scalar function over aggregate
functions is not taken into account. This leads to the bug mentioned above,
which is the result of misclassifying a scalar function as an aggregate
function. Changing this behaviour would be nice, but I guess it has major
ramifications.
was (Author: bchapuis):
I now better understand how the SqlValidator internals and I believe that (for
now ;-) naming scalar and aggregate functions differently is the right
approach. When determining if a function is an aggregate, the validator simply
checks if one of the matching functions is an aggregate. The type of operands,
the number of operands and the precedence of scalar function over aggregate
functions is not taken into account. This leads to the bug mentioned above,
which is the result of misclassifying a scalar function as an aggregate
function. Changing this behaviour would be nice, but I guess it has major
ramifications.
> Implement geometry aggregate functions
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5280
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5280
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Bertil Chapuis
> Assignee: Bertil Chapuis
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Geometry aggregate functions (ST_Accum, ST_Collect, and ST_Union) are
> currently missing in Calcite. Using an AggregateFunctionImpl looks be pretty
> straightforward, but many aggregate function implement SqlAggFunction
> directly.
> [~julianhyde] What would be the best way to implement them?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)