[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784220#comment-17784220 ]
Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-6098: ---------------------------------------------- I didn't have the full context thanks for sharing Julian. I wasn't exactly sure what were the generated files that the NOTICE was referring to. Now, I see that all the .scss files that we have in Calcite are indeed also present in the [Jekyll repo|https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/tree/3f3a283018a976da11a0bfcc13a20d43d37ee29f/docs/_sass]. I will try to see what's the appropriate LICENSE for those since it seems that Jekyll also took them from somewhere else (at least some of them). > Remove mentions of Jekyll from LICENSE and NOTICE files > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-6098 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6098 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Task > Affects Versions: 1.36.0 > Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis > Assignee: Stamatis Zampetakis > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > > The NOTICE file contains the following statement: > {noformat} > The web site includes files generated by Jekyll.{noformat} > > However, there is nothing in the [LICENSE of Jekyll > |https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/blob/3f3a283018a976da11a0bfcc13a20d43d37ee29f/LICENSE] > that requires such attribution. > According to the instructions of composing the [NOTICE > file|https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice] for ASF > projects we shouldn't add anything in there that is not *legally* required. > Moreover the generated files are not necessary licensed under the same > LICENSE with the generator. > JavaCC, ANTLR, and lots of other source generators use a variety of licenses > but the generated output is not licensed under the same terms. For instance, > Calcite uses JavaCC, which is licensed under > [BSD-3|https://github.com/javacc/javacc/blob/master/LICENSE] but both the > grammar as well as the generated .java files are AL2. > As long as we are not packaging bits of Jekyll in Calcite there is no need to > add explicit mentions in LICENSE or NOTICE files. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)