[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14394181#comment-14394181
]
Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-8594:
-------------------------------------
Yeah, I have the same thought in my mind, as the Reactive Extension makes the
async call composition, error handling quite easy, if camel pipeline can
leverage this module, the async engine code could be more easy to read, but I
don't know if it support the sync invocation at the same time.
Maybe we can start a new wiki page to collect more thoughts about it, and write
some POC code to verify the them.
> Camel and ReactiveX/RxJava
> --------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-8594
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8594
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Jyrki Ruuskanen
> Priority: Minor
>
> To me, ReactiveX and Camel looks like a perfect match. I'm wondering if all
> Camel routes could in future (Camel 3?) be based on RX?
> Camel would bring the components, front-ends and a variety of RX extensions,
> and routes/pipelines would be built as Observable<Exchange> sequences.
> This arrangement could greatly benefit both projects and simplify the Camel
> codebase as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
