[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14909125#comment-14909125
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-9153:
------------------------------------
Ah I think we only want to throw the exception if the task is not rejectable.
If the task is rejectable it handles the situation itself. So it should be an
if .. else ..
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy does not implement Abort as expected
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-9153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9153
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Michael Riedel
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.16.0
>
> Attachments: ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-Abort.patch,
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-AbortNonRejectable.patch,
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-AbortNonRejectable.patch,
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-AbortWithException.patch
>
>
> Not sure if this is a bug or just a documentation flaw (in fact I could not
> find documentation for it). Nevertheless, as a naive user, I kind of expected
> that the {{RejectedExecutionHandler}} of {{ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy.Abort}}
> would have similar semantics as Java's {{ThreadPoolExecutor.AbortPolicy}}.
> That is, I expected it to throw an {{Exception}}.
> Currently (that is in the 2.15.2 release, and on the master branch in git)
> that is not the case. In fact, {{Abort}} seems to work exactly the same way
> as {{Discard}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
