[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14908675#comment-14908675
 ] 

Michael Riedel commented on CAMEL-9153:
---------------------------------------

I tried to align my patch to Camel's coding style. Not sure if I succeeded, 
because the `checkstyle-result.xml` never contained any warnings after I ran 
the build (even with `-Psourcecheck`).

I'm a little confused regarding the unit test though. I couldn't find a test 
class for either {{ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy}} or {{ThreadsProcessor}}. Also, it 
seems that there are a lot more classes that make use of the 
{{RejectedExecutionHandlers}} provided by {{ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy}}. For 
example, the Spring configuration snippet that I posted above ultimately seems 
to instantiate a {{RejectableThreadPoolExecutor}}, for which I could not find a 
test class either. Wouldn't it be necessary to write/adjust unit tests for all 
classes that potentially make use of {{ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy}}?

> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy does not implement Abort as expected
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-9153
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9153
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Michael Riedel
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.16.0
>
>         Attachments: ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-Abort.patch, 
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-AbortNonRejectable.patch, 
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-AbortNonRejectable.patch
>
>
> Not sure if this is a bug or just a documentation flaw (in fact I could not 
> find documentation for it). Nevertheless, as a naive user, I kind of expected 
> that the {{RejectedExecutionHandler}} of {{ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy.Abort}} 
> would have similar semantics as Java's {{ThreadPoolExecutor.AbortPolicy}}. 
> That is, I expected it to throw an {{Exception}}.
> Currently (that is in the 2.15.2 release, and on the master branch in git) 
> that is not the case. In fact, {{Abort}} seems to work exactly the same way 
> as {{Discard}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to