[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-4103:
-------------------------------------------
ACS 4.3,0 feature freeze is Nov 8th. I will cut the 4.3 branch from master on
that day. Please provide an update on your issue as a comment.
> S3 reduced redundancy option should be per s3 resource and not a global
> setting.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-4103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4103
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Thomas O'Dowd
>
> Issue 3028 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3028) added a
> global option to control the setting of reduced redundancy (s3.rrs.enable).
> The default of the option is false.
> The reduced redundancy is normally an object level setting on S3 storage. For
> example, snapshots could be uploaded using reduced redundancy storage while
> templates are stored on normal storage. Currently we put everything in one
> bucket. Different S3 servers/buckets can also be added. The reduced
> redundancy could be configured as per bucket so that different objects going
> to that bucket can take up less storage resources. Eventually, we could also
> have configuration to split different types of objects out to different
> buckets but that needs more thought.
> John also mentioned in 3028:
> I don't feel that a global option is the correct functionality. In my
> opinion,
> it should be a flag on the object store instance.
> In general, I think we should employ global options sparingly due to
> their
> broad impact and the complexity they add to the operation of the
> system.
> This likely won't be done for 4.2 so I'm going to mark 3028 as closed as it
> solves the original issue where reduced redundancy was always being selected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)