[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14589514#comment-14589514
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8567:
--------------------------------------------

GitHub user sanjaytripathi opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/468

    CLOUDSTACK-8567 Migrating primary storage causes name_label field to …

    The fix is to set the VDI name-label in XenServer.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/sanjaytripathi/apache.cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-8567

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/468.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #468
    
----
commit a2f63975c7f89902eb62b9448c3bae52e39da88e
Author: Sanjay Tripathi <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-04-17T08:12:26Z

    CLOUDSTACK-8567 Migrating primary storage causes name_label field to blank.

----


> Migrating primary storage causes name_label field to blank
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8567
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8567
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>         Environment: XenServer
>            Reporter: Sanjay Tripathi
>            Assignee: Sanjay Tripathi
>             Fix For: 4.6.0
>
>
> If user migrate a disk across primary storages the name_label (on XS) field 
> is not maintained. They would like the disk name to be maintained as it makes 
> administration easier.
> I see the name_label is blanked and the disk no longer has a name. This is an 
> issue if user has multiple disks on the SR without names.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to