[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031391#comment-15031391
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-6276:
--------------------------------------------
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1134#issuecomment-160532869
Yes, I understand and it makes sense to have that documented. It doesn't
have to mean we phase out QueryService. This makes sense to be there for people
with read-only access and it can be used by other services. It also makes sense
to consider if Example is a final type of resource or a generic (or
implementation of a generic type of resource). A service would be for the whole
family, would it?
btw @pdube none of my remarks should be interpreted as a -1 to your PR! I
like big very much this ;)
> Affinity Groups within projects
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-6276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6276
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
> Reporter: Ingo Jochim
>
> Hello,
> I like to have the features "Affinity Group" and "Project" combined.
> As far as I know I cannot use Affinity Groups within Projects.
> Thanks and regards,
> Ingo
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
