[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15105567#comment-15105567
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9239:
--------------------------------------------
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1349
CLOUDSTACK-9239 throw exception on deprecated command
an API call to LockAccount fails silently with a 200 return and no
contents. client are responsible to check and will find that no locking has
actually occured. This way they may be lured to a sense of false security.
Throwing an exption makes the failure explicit.
cloudmonkey lock account name=<name> domainid=<id>
now errors out with an http result of 530
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/DaanHoogland/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9239
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1349.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1349
----
commit 28e17165c0105caa09c54105863944ff156a19f0
Author: Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-01-18T14:01:33Z
CLOUDSTACK-9239 throw exception on deprecated command
----
> lock account silently fails
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9239
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Daan Hoogland
> Assignee: Daan Hoogland
>
> lock account has an implementation consisting of a commented out contents of
> the execute method, hence it silently fails.
> We should throw at least a CloudRuntimeException or a NotImplemetedException.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)