[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15105571#comment-15105571
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9239:
--------------------------------------------
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1349#issuecomment-172603168
Shouldn’t we make that clear at the documentation too?
I mean, the method/function should contain some info about the removal of
the function. It is not the deprecation of a method per se, but it is the
removal of a function.
> lock account silently fails
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9239
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Daan Hoogland
> Assignee: Daan Hoogland
>
> lock account has an implementation consisting of a commented out contents of
> the execute method, hence it silently fails.
> We should throw at least a CloudRuntimeException or a NotImplemetedException.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
