[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15204926#comment-15204926
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9297:
--------------------------------------------

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#discussion_r56880597
  
    --- Diff: 
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
 ---
    @@ -279,7 +282,52 @@ public boolean deleteSnapshot(Long snapshotId) {
     
         @Override
         public boolean revertSnapshot(SnapshotInfo snapshot) {
    -        throw new CloudRuntimeException("revert Snapshot is not 
supported");
    +        if (canHandle(snapshot,SnapshotOperation.REVERT) == 
StrategyPriority.CANT_HANDLE) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Hi @DaanHoogland, this was only my first doubt (question). After that, 
@mike-tutkowski  and I exchanged some other messages and then I understood the 
method. I see why a boolean return would not suffice all of its needs.
    
    I was misled by the name of the method. Every time I see a method name that 
starts with "can/has/is", I think that it will return a boolean value. 
    
    The code of this PR is OK for me; I would only suggest a name change on 
that "canHandle" method to a more descriptive one.


> delete snapshot without id is failing with Unable to determine the storage 
> pool of the snapshot
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9297
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9297
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 4.7.0, 4.8.0
>         Environment: Ubuntu 14.04.3 management + kvm
>            Reporter: Özhan Rüzgar Karaman
>            Assignee: Mike Tutkowski
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to