[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17412773#comment-17412773
]
Julius Davies commented on IO-556:
----------------------------------
[~jameshowe] - goes back to 1.1. FilenameUtils not present in 1.0.
{code:java}
java -cp commons-io-1.1.jar:. T '//../foo'
//../foo
{code}
{code:java}
java -cp commons-io-2.6.jar:. T '//../foo'
//../foo
{code}
{code:java}
java -cp commons-io-2.7.jar:. T '//../foo'
null
{code}
(Based on a T.java like this):
{code:java}
public class T {
public class T { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
System.out.println( org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils.normalize(args[0]));
}
}
{code}
> Unexpected behavior of FileNameUtils.normalize may lead to limited path
> traversal vulnerabilies
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IO-556
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-556
> Project: Commons IO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Utilities
> Affects Versions: 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Lukas Euler
> Priority: Major
> Labels: security, security-issue
>
> I sent this report in an Email to [email protected] on 2017-10-16. I did
> not receive any kind of response yet (2017-11-18 as of writing). I am now
> posting it publicly, to open the issue up for discussion, and hopefully
> initiate a fix.
> This report is not about a vulnerability in {{commons-io}} per se, but an
> unexpected behavior that has a high chance of introducing a path traversal
> vulnerability when using {{FileNameUtils.normalize}} to sanitize user input.
> The traversal is limited to a single out-of-bounds-stepping "/../" segment.
> h5. Reproduction
> {Code}
> FileNameUtils.normalize("//../foo"); // returns "//../foo" or
> "\\\\..\\foo", based on java.io.File.separatorChar
> FileNameUtils.normalize("\\\\..\\foo"); // returns "//../foo" or
> "\\\\..\\foo", based on java.io.File.separatorChar
> {Code}
> h5. Possible impact (example)
> Consider a web-application that uses {{FileNameUtils.normalize}} to sanitize
> a user-supplied file name string, and then appends the sanitized value to a
> configured upload directory to store the uploaded content in:
> {Code}
> String fileName = "//../foo"; // actually user-supplied (e.g. from
> multipart-POST request)
> fileName = FileNameUtils.normalize(fileName); // still holds the same
> value ("//../foo")
>
> if (fileName != null) {
> File newFile = new File("/base/uploads", fileName); // java.io.File
> treats double forward slashes as singles
> // newFile now points to
> "/base/uploads//../foo"
> newFile = newFile.getCanonicalFile(); // newFile now points to
> "/base/foo", which should be inaccessible
> // Write contents to newFile...
> } else {
> // Assume malicious activity, handle error
> }
> {Code}
> h5. Relevant code locations
> * {{org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils#getPrefixLength}} : everything
> between a leading "//" and the next "/" is treated as a UNC server name, and
> ignored in all further validation logic of
> {{org.apache.commons.io.FilenameUtils#doNormalize}} .
> h5. Discussion
> One might argue that the given example is a misuse of the
> {{FileNameUtils.normalize}} method, and that everyone using it should expect
> absolute paths, full UNC paths, etc. to be returned by the method.
> Furthermore, the vulnerability can only occur due to the lax behavior of
> {{java.io.File}} .
> On the other hand, I believe that the JavaDoc of {{FileNameUtils.normalize}}
> suggests to most readers, that this method is exactly what is needed to
> sanitize file names:
> {noformat}
> //-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> /**
> * Normalizes a path, removing double and single dot path steps,
> * and removing any final directory separator.
> * <p>
> * This method normalizes a path to a standard format.
> * The input may contain separators in either Unix or Windows format.
> * The output will contain separators in the format of the system.
> * <p>
> * A trailing slash will be removed.
> * A double slash will be merged to a single slash (but UNC names are
> handled).
> * A single dot path segment will be removed.
> * A double dot will cause that path segment and the one before to be
> removed.
> * If the double dot has no parent path segment to work with, {@code null}
> * is returned.
> * <p>
> * The output will be the same on both Unix and Windows except
> * for the separator character.
> * <pre>
> * /foo// --> /foo
> * /foo/./ --> /foo
> * /foo/../bar --> /bar
> * /foo/../bar/ --> /bar
> * /foo/../bar/../baz --> /baz
> * //foo//./bar --> /foo/bar
> * /../ --> null
> * ../foo --> null
> * foo/bar/.. --> foo
> * foo/../../bar --> null
> * foo/../bar --> bar
> * //server/foo/../bar --> //server/bar
> * //server/../bar --> null
> * C:\foo\..\bar --> C:\bar
> * C:\..\bar --> null
> * ~/foo/../bar/ --> ~/bar
> * ~/../bar --> null
> * </pre>
> * (Note the file separator returned will be correct for Windows/Unix)
> *
> * @param filename the filename to normalize, null returns null
> * @return the normalized filename, or null if invalid. Null bytes inside
> string will be removed
> */
> {noformat}
> I have done a quick survey of the usages of the method in public GitHub
> repositories. I have found numerous projects that suffer from the limited
> path traversal vulnerability that is described here because of this very
> issue. This includes Webservers, Web-Frameworks, Archive-Extraction-Software,
> and others.
> Preventing path traversal attacks is not trivial, and many people turn to
> libraries like {{commons-io}} to avoid making mistakes when implementing
> parsing logic on their own. They trust that {{FileNameUtils}} will provide
> them with the most complete, and suitable sanitation logic for file names.
> In addition, ".." is not a valid UNC host name according to
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/gg465305.aspx , so prohibiting it
> shouldn't result in any major problems.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
