Cp-John commented on pull request #116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/116#issuecomment-971231217


   > Looks harmless and, as @psteitz pointed out, looks like it will improve 
performance for some pools. Created placeholder issue, and looked at coverage.
   > 
   > 
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/304786/141954169-6c01c81c-1cb2-47cd-be8c-981035a4bb1f.png)
   > 
   > Even though it shows the line as covered, I believe not all branches of 
the condition statement are covered. Not sure if it'd be easy to add a unit 
test for when `getBlockWhenExhausted()` is `true` and when it's `false` (maybe 
to avoid regressions)?
   > 
   > Thanks Bruno
   
   Hi Bruno! Thanks for your prompt response.
   
   I have added two unit tests for when `getBlockWhenExhausted()` is `true` and 
when it's `false`.
   
   Cheers,
   Cao Peng


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to