[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575452#comment-13575452
]
Jens Kübler commented on MATH-932:
----------------------------------
- I'm in no hurry for integration. I needed these filters and wanted to share
them so 4.0 is ok for me as I keep local development branch for me.
- I have some tests that are not production quality because I still need to
play with filter parameters. When I'm confident the filters perform in the
expected way, I could supply them as well. The Kalman-Smoother i.e. has still
some bugs I recently discovered.
- I set up checkstyle with the math checkstyle file but discovered that most of
the api does not convey to it. So my question is how strictly is it enforced?
- Interface renaming is not a problem
- I guess there is a little bit more to do...
- In my development branch, I switched compatibility back to 5 with no problems
and removed the annotations.
Thanks for the hints
Jens
> Contributions to filter package
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-932
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jens Kübler
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: extendedKalmanSupport.txt
>
>
> - Extended Kalman Filter with user supplied transition functions
> - Unscented Kalman Filter
> - Rauch Tung Striebel Kalman Smoother
> - Ability to supply combinations of nonlinear and linear kalman filter
> setups, i.e. nonlinear unscented system transition with a linear
> measurment update
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
