[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13797699#comment-13797699
]
Joerg Schaible commented on LANG-769:
-------------------------------------
bq. Should we move it into the exception subpackage?
That package was originally meant to collect stuff with functionality around
exceptions, but not to collect the various exceptions of lang. However, I
failed myself, when I introduced the CloneFailedException :-/
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lang.exception.*
> Reporter: david cogen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2, Discussion
>
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the
> version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard
> exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the
> problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the
> library; not just internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both
> commons-lang and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be
> very nice to have these back.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
