[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13801099#comment-13801099
]
Henri Yandell commented on LANG-769:
------------------------------------
They're all runtime exceptions, so I'm not sure it matters too much. I've put
this in the core package for shortness sake.
svn ci -m "Returning NotImplementedException to Lang after it was removed in
Lang 3.0 per the request in LANG-769. " src
Adding
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/NotImplementedException.java
Adding
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/NotImplementedExceptionTest.java
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 1534380.
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lang.exception.*
> Reporter: david cogen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2
>
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the
> version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard
> exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the
> problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the
> library; not just internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both
> commons-lang and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be
> very nice to have these back.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
