[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16996728#comment-16996728
]
Gilles Sadowski commented on COLLECTIONS-728:
---------------------------------------------
{quote}{{HashFunction}}
{quote}
I still have the impression that we are carried away from the main contribution
by an interface whose contents seems (?) to be defined by "out-of-bands"
requirements.
It seems (IIUC) that [Collections] will have to create the class that
"implements" the interface, as a wrapper to a third-party hash function
implementation (because the third party will most probably *not* depend on
[Collections]); hence I don't see why not use an enum (or a "registry", as Alex
suggested) in order to make the check obvious and simple: The _same_ function
must be used whatever its specific "properties" (cyclic, or whatever).
> BloomFilter contribution
> ------------------------
>
> Key: COLLECTIONS-728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-728
> Project: Commons Collections
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Claude Warren
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: BF_Func.md, BloomFilter.java, BloomFilterI2.java,
> Usage.md
>
>
> Contribution of BloomFilter library comprising base implementation and gated
> collections.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
